The previous approach modifies name in-place in the request slice to avoid an allocation.
This is incorrect: the question section of a DNS request
must be copied verbatim, without any such modification.
Software may rely on it (we rely on other resolvers doing it it in tsdns/forwarder).
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>
It was lost during a copy from wgcfg.NewPresharedKey (which doesn't
clamp) instead of wgcfg.NewPrivateKey (which does).
Fortunately this was only use for discovery messages (not WireGuard)
and only for ephemeral process-lifetime keys.
* advertise server's DERP public key following its ServerHello
* have client look for that DEPR public key in the response
PeerCertificates
* let client advertise it's going into a "fast start" mode
if it finds it
* modify server to support that fast start mode, just not
sending the HTTP response header
Cuts down another round trip, bringing the latency of being able to
write our first DERP frame from SF to Bangalore from ~725ms
(3 RTT) to ~481ms (2 RTT: TCP and TLS).
Fixes#693
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
control/controlclient, wgengine/filter: extract parsePacketFilter to new constructor in wgengine/filter
Signed-off-by: chungdaniel <daniel@tailscale.com>
It just has a version number in it and it's not really needed.
Instead just return it as a normal Recv message type for those
that care (currently only tests).
Updates #150 (in that it shares the same goal: initial DERP latency)
Updates #199 (in that it removes some DERP versioning)
We're beginning to reference DERP region names in the admin UI, so it's
best to consolidate this information in our DERP map.
Signed-off-by: Ross Zurowski <ross@rosszurowski.com>
Consider:
Hard NAT (A) <---> Hard NAT w/ mapped port (B)
If A sends a packet to B's mapped port, A can disco ping B directly,
with low latency, without DERP.
But B couldn't establish a path back to A and needed to use DERP,
despite already logging about A's endpoint and adding a mapping to it
for other purposes (the wireguard conn.Endpoint lookup also needed
it).
This adds the tracking to discoEndpoint too so it'll be used for
finding a path back.
Fixestailscale/corp#556
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Strictly speaking, we don't know that it's a wireguard packet, just that
it doesn't look like a disco packet.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
These aren't particularly performance critical,
but since I have an optimization pending for them,
it's worth having a corresponding benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
For example:
$ tailscale ping -h
USAGE
ping <hostname-or-IP>
FLAGS
-c 10 max number of pings to send
-stop-once-direct true stop once a direct path is established
-verbose false verbose output
$ tailscale ping mon.ts.tailscale.com
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via DERP(sfo) in 65ms
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via DERP(sfo) in 252ms
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via [2604:a880:2:d1::36:d001]:41641 in 33ms
Fixes#661
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This benchmark is far from perfect: It mixes together
client and server. Still, it provides a starting point
for easy profiling.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Dmytro Shynkevych
Brad Fitzpatrick
chungdaniel
halulu
Ross Zurowski
Josh Bleecher Snyder
David Anderson
Mike Kramlich
Josh Bleecher Snyder