The existing implementation was completely, embarrassingly conceptually broken.
We aren't able to see whether wireguard-go's receive function goroutines
are running or not. All we can do is model that based on what we have done.
This commit fixes that model.
Fixes#1781
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Avery reported a sub-ms health transition from "receiveIPv4 not running" to "ok".
To avoid these transient false-positives, be more precise about
the expected lifetime of receive funcs. The problematic case is one in which
they were started but exited prior to a call to connBind.Close.
Explicitly represent started vs running state, taking care with the order of updates.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
I've spent two days searching for a theoretical wireguard-go bug
around receive functions exiting early.
I've found many bugs, but none of the flavor we're looking for.
Restore wireguard-go's logging around starting and stopping receive functions,
so that we can definitively rule in or out this particular theory.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
I see a bunch of these in some logs I'm looking at,
separated only by a few seconds.
Log the error so we can tell what's going on here.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
These were getting rate-limited for nodes with many peers.
Consolate the output into single lines, which are nicer anyway.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
We were accidentally logging oldPort -> oldPort.
Log oldPort as well as c.port; if we failed to get the preferred port
in a previous rebind, oldPort might differ from c.port.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
These aren't particularly performance critical,
but since I have an optimization pending for them,
it's worth having a corresponding benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This benchmark is far from perfect: It mixes together
client and server. Still, it provides a starting point
for easy profiling.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
iOS doesn't let you run subprocesses,
which means we can't use netstat to get routing information.
Instead, use syscalls and grub around in the results.
We keep the old netstat version around,
both for use in non-cgo builds,
and for use testing the syscall-based version.
Note that iOS doesn't ship route.h,
so we include a copy here from the macOS 10.15 SDK
(which is itself unchanged from the 10.14 SDK).
I have tested manually that this yields the correct
gateway IP address on my own macOS and iOS devices.
More coverage would be most welcome.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
