The flags were --no-blah for a brief time, then we switched them to
--blah=true/false with a default of true, but didn't fix the boolean
inversions in the code. So up was down, true was false, etc.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We have a filter in tailscaled itself now, which is more robust
against weird network topologies (such as the one Docker creates).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The zstd library treats that limit as a hard cap on decompressed
size, in the mode we're using it, rather than a window size.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This allows tailscaled's own traffic to bypass Tailscale-managed routes,
so that things like tailscale-provided default routes don't break
tailscaled itself.
Progress on #144.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It can only be built with corp deps anyway, and having it split
from the control code makes our lives harder.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The comment module is compiled out on several embedded systems (and
also gentoo, because netfilter can't go brrrr with comments holding it
back). Attempting to use comments results in a confusing error, and a
non-functional firewall.
Additionally, make the legacy rule cleanup non-fatal, because we *do*
have to probe for the existence of these -m comment rules, and doing
so will error out on these systems.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This saves a layer of translation, and saves us having to
pass in extra bits and pieces of the netmap and prefs to
wgengine. Now it gets one Wireguard config, and one OS
network stack config.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Defensive programming against #368 in environments other than Docker,
e.g. if you try using Tailscale in Alpine Linux directly, sans
container.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The iptables package we use doesn't include command output, so we're
left with guessing what went wrong most of the time. This will at
least narrow things down to which operation failed.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Instead, pass in only exactly the relevant configuration pieces
that the OS network stack cares about.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
New logic installs precise filters for subnet routes,
plays nice with other users of netfilter, and lays the
groundwork for fixing routing loops via policy routing.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This strictly sequences things such that c1 is fully registered in
the control server before c2 creates its poll. Failure to do this
can cause an inversion where c2's poll finishes establishing
before c1's poll starts, which results in c2 getting disconnected
rather than c1, and the test times out waiting for c1 to get kicked.
Fixes#98.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The test is straightforward, but it's a little perplexing if you're
not overly familiar with controlclient.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Makes parsing 4.6x faster.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ParseInt-12 32.1ns ± 1% 6.9ns ± 2% -78.55% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Failure to do this leads to fd exhaustion at -count=10000,
and increasingly poor execution north of -count=100.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Failure to do so triggers either a data race or a panic
in the testing package, due to racey use of t.Logf.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The UDP reader goroutine was clobbering `n` and `err` from the
main goroutine, whose accesses are not synchronized the way `b` is.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
wireguard-go closes magicsock, and expects this to unblock reads
so that its internal goroutines can wind down. We were incorrectly
blocking the read indefinitey and breaking this contract.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's extremely flaky in several dimensions, as well as very slow.
It's making the CI completely red all the time without telling us
useful information.
Set RUN_CURSED_TESTS=1 to run locally.
This change just alters the semantics of the one flaky test, without
trying to speed up timeouts on the others. Empirically, speeding up
the timeouts causes _more_ flakes right now :(
The remaining flake occurs due to a mysterious packet loss. This
doesn't affect normal tailscaled operations, so until I track down
where the loss occurs and fix it, the flaky test is going to be
lenient about packet loss (but not about whether the spray logic
worked).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It previously passed incorrectly due to bugs. With those fixed,
it becomes flaky for 2 reasons. One of them is the wireguard handshake
race, which can eat the 1st sprayed packet and prevent roamAddr
discovery. This change fixes that failure, by spreading the test
traffic out enough that additional spraying occurs.
Signed-Off-By: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The previous code would skip the DERP short-circuit if roamAddr
was set, which is not what we wanted. More generally, hitting
any of the fast path conditions is a direct return, so we can
just have 3 standalone branches rather than 'else if' stuff.
Signed-Off-By: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The effect is subtle: when we're not spraying packets, and have not yet
figured out a curAddr, and we're not spraying, we end up sending to
whatever the first IP is in the iteration order. In English, that
means "when we have no idea where to send packets, and we've given
up on sending to everyone, just send to the first addr we see in
the list."
This is, in general, what we want, because the addrs are in sorted
preference order, low to high, and DERP is the least preferred
destination. So, when we have no idea where to send, send to DERP,
right?
... Except for very historical reasons, appendDests iterated through
addresses in _reverse_ order, most preferred to least preferred.
crawshaw@ believes this was part of the earliest handshaking
algorithm magicsock had, where it slowly iterated through possible
destinations and poked handshakes to them one at a time.
Anyway, because of this historical reverse iteration, in the case
described above of "we have no idea where to send", the code would
end up sending to the _most_ preferred candidate address, rather
than the _least_ preferred. So when in doubt, we'd end up firing
packets into the blackhole of some LAN address that doesn't work,
and connectivity would not work.
This case only comes up if all your non-DERP connectivity options
have failed, so we more or less failed to detect it because we
didn't have a pathological test box deployed. Worse, codependent
bug 2839854994 made DERP accidentally
work sometimes anyway by incorrectly exploiting roamAddr behavior,
albeit at the cost of making DERP traffic symmetric. In fixing
DERP to once again be asymmetric, we effectively removed the
bandaid that was concealing this bug.
Signed-Off-By: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
DERP traffic is asymmetric by design, with nodes always sending
to their peer's home DERP server. However, if roamAddr is set,
magicsock will always push data there, rather than let DERP
server selection do its thing, so we end up accidentally
creating a symmetric flow.
Signed-Off-By: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
David Anderson
