Files
tailscale/tka/tka_test.go
T
Alex Chan d6ffc0d986 tka,ipn: reduce boilerplate in Tailnet Lock tests
The `CreateStateForTest` helper reduces boilerplate in cases where the test
only cares about the trusted keys and not the disablement values (and makes
it more obvious where the disablement values are meaningful).

The `setupChonkStorage` helper reduces the boilerplate when creating on-disk
TKA storage in tests.

The `fakeLocalBackend` helper reduces the boilerplate when setting up a
`LocalBackend` instance in the IPN tests.

Updates #cleanup

Change-Id: Iacfba1be5f7fab208eec11e4369d63c7d7519da5
Signed-off-by: Alex Chan <alexc@tailscale.com>
2026-05-07 21:49:27 +01:00

688 lines
20 KiB
Go

// Copyright (c) Tailscale Inc & contributors
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
package tka
import (
"bytes"
"strings"
"testing"
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp"
"tailscale.com/types/key"
"tailscale.com/types/tkatype"
)
func TestComputeChainCandidates(t *testing.T) {
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> I1 -> I2 -> I3 -> L2
| -> L1 | -> L3
G2 -> L4
// We tweak these AUMs so they are different hashes.
G2.hashSeed = 2
L1.hashSeed = 2
L3.hashSeed = 2
L4.hashSeed = 3
`)
// Should result in 4 chains:
// G1->L1, G1->L2, G1->L3, G2->L4
i1H := c.AUMHashes["I1"]
got, err := computeChainCandidates(c.Chonk(), &i1H, 50)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeChainCandidates() failed: %v", err)
}
want := []chain{
{Oldest: c.AUMs["G2"], Head: c.AUMs["L4"]},
{Oldest: c.AUMs["G1"], Head: c.AUMs["L3"], chainsThroughActive: true},
{Oldest: c.AUMs["G1"], Head: c.AUMs["L1"], chainsThroughActive: true},
{Oldest: c.AUMs["G1"], Head: c.AUMs["L2"], chainsThroughActive: true},
}
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got, cmp.AllowUnexported(chain{})); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("chains differ (-want, +got):\n%s", diff)
}
}
func TestForkResolutionHash(t *testing.T) {
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
| -> L2
// tweak hashes so L1 & L2 are not identical
L1.hashSeed = 2
L2.hashSeed = 3
`)
got, err := computeActiveChain(c.Chonk(), nil, 50)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeActiveChain() failed: %v", err)
}
// The fork with the lowest AUM hash should have been chosen.
l1H := c.AUMHashes["L1"]
l2H := c.AUMHashes["L2"]
want := l1H
if bytes.Compare(l2H[:], l1H[:]) < 0 {
want = l2H
}
if got := got.Head.Hash(); got != want {
t.Errorf("head was %x, want %x", got, want)
}
}
func TestForkResolutionSigWeight(t *testing.T) {
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
| -> L2
G1.template = addKey
L1.hashSeed = 11
L2.signedWith = key
`,
optTemplate("addKey", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &key}),
optKey("key", key, priv))
l1H := c.AUMHashes["L1"]
l2H := c.AUMHashes["L2"]
if bytes.Compare(l2H[:], l1H[:]) < 0 {
t.Fatal("failed assert: h(l1) > h(l2)\nTweak hashSeed till this passes")
}
got, err := computeActiveChain(c.Chonk(), nil, 50)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeActiveChain() failed: %v", err)
}
// Based on the hash, l1H should be chosen.
// But based on the signature weight (which has higher
// precedence), it should be l2H
want := l2H
if got := got.Head.Hash(); got != want {
t.Errorf("head was %x, want %x", got, want)
}
}
func TestForkResolutionMessageType(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
| -> L2
| -> L3
G1.template = addKey
L1.hashSeed = 11
L2.template = removeKey
L3.hashSeed = 18
`,
optTemplate("addKey", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &key}),
optTemplate("removeKey", AUM{MessageKind: AUMRemoveKey, KeyID: key.MustID()}))
l1H := c.AUMHashes["L1"]
l2H := c.AUMHashes["L2"]
l3H := c.AUMHashes["L3"]
if bytes.Compare(l2H[:], l1H[:]) < 0 {
t.Fatal("failed assert: h(l1) > h(l2)\nTweak hashSeed till this passes")
}
if bytes.Compare(l2H[:], l3H[:]) < 0 {
t.Fatal("failed assert: h(l3) > h(l2)\nTweak hashSeed till this passes")
}
got, err := computeActiveChain(c.Chonk(), nil, 50)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeActiveChain() failed: %v", err)
}
// Based on the hash, L1 or L3 should be chosen.
// But based on the preference for AUMRemoveKey messages,
// it should be L2.
want := l2H
if got := got.Head.Hash(); got != want {
t.Errorf("head was %x, want %x", got, want)
}
}
func TestComputeStateAt(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> I1 -> I2
I1.template = addKey
`,
optTemplate("addKey", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &key}))
// G1 is before the key, so there shouldn't be a key there.
state, err := computeStateAt(c.Chonk(), 500, c.AUMHashes["G1"])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeStateAt(G1) failed: %v", err)
}
if _, err := state.GetKey(key.MustID()); err != ErrNoSuchKey {
t.Errorf("expected key to be missing: err = %v", err)
}
if *state.LastAUMHash != c.AUMHashes["G1"] {
t.Errorf("LastAUMHash = %x, want %x", *state.LastAUMHash, c.AUMHashes["G1"])
}
// I1 & I2 are after the key, so the computed state should contain
// the key.
for _, wantHash := range []AUMHash{c.AUMHashes["I1"], c.AUMHashes["I2"]} {
state, err = computeStateAt(c.Chonk(), 500, wantHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("computeStateAt(%X) failed: %v", wantHash, err)
}
if *state.LastAUMHash != wantHash {
t.Errorf("LastAUMHash = %x, want %x", *state.LastAUMHash, wantHash)
}
if _, err := state.GetKey(key.MustID()); err != nil {
t.Errorf("expected key to be present at state: err = %v", err)
}
}
}
// fakeAUM generates an AUM structure based on the template.
// If parent is provided, PrevAUMHash is set to that value.
//
// If template is an AUM, the returned AUM is based on that.
// If template is an int, a NOOP AUM is returned, and the
// provided int can be used to tweak the resulting hash (needed
// for tests you want one AUM to be 'lower' than another, so that
// that chain is taken based on fork resolution rules).
func fakeAUM(t *testing.T, template any, parent *AUMHash) (AUM, AUMHash) {
t.Helper()
if seed, ok := template.(int); ok {
a := AUM{MessageKind: AUMNoOp, KeyID: []byte{byte(seed)}}
if parent != nil {
a.PrevAUMHash = (*parent)[:]
}
h := a.Hash()
return a, h
}
if a, ok := template.(AUM); ok {
if parent != nil {
a.PrevAUMHash = (*parent)[:]
}
h := a.Hash()
return a, h
}
panic("template must be an int or an AUM")
}
func TestOpenAuthority(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
// /- L1
// G1 - I1 - I2 - I3 -L2
// \-L3
// G2 - L4
//
// We set the previous-known ancestor to G1, so the
// ancestor to start from should be G1.
g1, g1H := fakeAUM(t, AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &key}, nil)
i1, i1H := fakeAUM(t, 2, &g1H) // AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &key2}
l1, l1H := fakeAUM(t, 13, &i1H)
i2, i2H := fakeAUM(t, 2, &i1H)
i3, i3H := fakeAUM(t, 5, &i2H)
l2, l2H := fakeAUM(t, AUM{MessageKind: AUMNoOp, KeyID: []byte{7}, Signatures: []tkatype.Signature{{KeyID: key.MustID()}}}, &i3H)
l3, l3H := fakeAUM(t, 4, &i3H)
g2, g2H := fakeAUM(t, 8, nil)
l4, _ := fakeAUM(t, 9, &g2H)
// We make sure that I2 has a lower hash than L1, so
// it should take that path rather than L1.
if bytes.Compare(l1H[:], i2H[:]) < 0 {
t.Fatal("failed assert: h(i2) > h(l1)\nTweak parameters to fakeAUM till this passes")
}
// We make sure L2 has a signature with key, so it should
// take that path over L3. We assert that the L3 hash
// is less than L2 so the test will fail if the signature
// preference logic is broken.
if bytes.Compare(l2H[:], l3H[:]) < 0 {
t.Fatal("failed assert: h(l3) > h(l2)\nTweak parameters to fakeAUM till this passes")
}
// Construct the state of durable storage.
chonk := ChonkMem()
err := chonk.CommitVerifiedAUMs([]AUM{g1, i1, l1, i2, i3, l2, l3, g2, l4})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
chonk.SetLastActiveAncestor(i1H)
a, err := Open(chonk)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("New() failed: %v", err)
}
// Should include the key added in G1
if _, err := a.state.GetKey(key.MustID()); err != nil {
t.Errorf("missing G1 key: %v", err)
}
// The head of the chain should be L2.
if a.Head() != l2H {
t.Errorf("head was %x, want %x", a.state.LastAUMHash, l2H)
}
}
func TestOpenAuthority_EmptyErrors(t *testing.T) {
_, err := Open(ChonkMem())
if err == nil {
t.Error("Expected an error initializing an empty authority, got nil")
}
}
func TestAuthorityHead(t *testing.T) {
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
| -> L2
L1.hashSeed = 2
`)
a, _ := Open(c.Chonk())
if got, want := a.head.Hash(), a.Head(); got != want {
t.Errorf("Hash() returned %x, want %x", got, want)
}
}
func TestAuthorityValidDisablement(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
disablementSecret := []byte{1, 2, 3}
state := State{
Keys: []Key{key},
DisablementValues: [][]byte{DisablementKDF(disablementSecret)},
}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
G1.template = genesis
`,
optTemplate("genesis", AUM{MessageKind: AUMCheckpoint, State: &state}),
)
a, _ := Open(c.Chonk())
if valid := a.ValidDisablement([]byte{1, 2, 3}); !valid {
t.Error("ValidDisablement() returned false, want true")
}
}
func TestCreateBootstrapAuthority(t *testing.T) {
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
a1, genesisAUM, err := Create(ChonkMem(), CreateStateForTest(key), signer25519(priv))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Create() failed: %v", err)
}
a2, err := Bootstrap(ChonkMem(), genesisAUM)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Bootstrap() failed: %v", err)
}
if a1.Head() != a2.Head() {
t.Fatal("created and bootstrapped authority differ")
}
// Both authorities should trust the key laid down in the genesis state.
if !a1.KeyTrusted(key.MustID()) {
t.Error("a1 did not trust genesis key")
}
if !a2.KeyTrusted(key.MustID()) {
t.Error("a2 did not trust genesis key")
}
}
// Trying to bootstrap an already-bootstrapped Chonk is an error.
func TestBootstrapChonkMustBeEmpty(t *testing.T) {
chonk := ChonkMem()
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
state := CreateStateForTest(key)
// Bootstrap our chonk for the first time, which should succeed.
_, _, err := Create(chonk, state, signer25519(priv))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Create() failed: %v", err)
}
// Bootstrap our chonk for the second time, which should fail, because
// it already contains data.
_, _, err = Create(chonk, state, signer25519(priv))
if wantErr := "tailchonk is not empty"; err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), wantErr) {
t.Fatalf("Create() did not fail with expected error: want %q, got %v", wantErr, err)
}
}
func TestBootstrapWithInvalidAUMs(t *testing.T) {
for _, tt := range []struct {
Name string
GenesisAUM AUM
WantErr string
}{
{
Name: "invalid-message-kind",
GenesisAUM: AUM{MessageKind: AUMNoOp},
WantErr: "bootstrap AUMs must be checkpoint messages",
},
{
Name: "missing-state",
GenesisAUM: AUM{MessageKind: AUMCheckpoint},
WantErr: "bootstrap AUM is missing state",
},
{
Name: "no-disablement-secret",
GenesisAUM: AUM{
MessageKind: AUMCheckpoint,
State: &State{},
},
WantErr: "at least one disablement secret required",
},
} {
t.Run(tt.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
_, err := Bootstrap(ChonkMem(), tt.GenesisAUM)
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), tt.WantErr) {
t.Fatalf("Bootstrap() did not fail with expected error: want %q, got %v", tt.WantErr, err)
}
})
}
}
func TestAuthorityInformNonLinear(t *testing.T) {
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1
| -> L2 -> L3
| -> L4 -> L5
G1.template = genesis
L1.hashSeed = 2
L2.hashSeed = 2
L4.hashSeed = 2
`,
genesisTemplate(key),
optKey("key", key, priv),
optSignAllUsing("key"))
storage := ChonkMem()
a, err := Bootstrap(storage, c.AUMs["G1"])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Bootstrap() failed: %v", err)
}
// L2 does not chain from L1, disabling the isHeadChain optimization
// and forcing Inform() to take the slow path.
informAUMs := []AUM{c.AUMs["L1"], c.AUMs["L2"], c.AUMs["L3"], c.AUMs["L4"], c.AUMs["L5"]}
if err := a.Inform(storage, informAUMs); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Inform() failed: %v", err)
}
for i, update := range informAUMs {
stored, err := storage.AUM(update.Hash())
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("reading stored update %d: %v", i, err)
continue
}
if diff := cmp.Diff(update, stored); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("update %d differs (-want, +got):\n%s", i, diff)
}
}
if a.Head() != c.AUMHashes["L3"] {
t.Logf("a.Head() = %s", a.Head())
t.Logf("auMHashes = %v", c.AUMHashes)
t.Fatal("authority did not converge to correct AUM")
}
}
func TestAuthorityInformLinear(t *testing.T) {
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
c := newTestchain(t, `
G1 -> L1 -> L2 -> L3
G1.template = genesis
`,
genesisTemplate(key),
optKey("key", key, priv),
optSignAllUsing("key"))
storage := ChonkMem()
a, err := Bootstrap(storage, c.AUMs["G1"])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Bootstrap() failed: %v", err)
}
informAUMs := []AUM{c.AUMs["L1"], c.AUMs["L2"], c.AUMs["L3"]}
if err := a.Inform(storage, informAUMs); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Inform() failed: %v", err)
}
for i, update := range informAUMs {
stored, err := storage.AUM(update.Hash())
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("reading stored update %d: %v", i, err)
continue
}
if diff := cmp.Diff(update, stored); diff != "" {
t.Errorf("update %d differs (-want, +got):\n%s", i, diff)
}
}
if a.Head() != c.AUMHashes["L3"] {
t.Fatal("authority did not converge to correct AUM")
}
}
func TestInteropWithNLKey(t *testing.T) {
priv1 := key.NewNLPrivate()
pub1 := priv1.Public()
pub2 := key.NewNLPrivate().Public()
pub3 := key.NewNLPrivate().Public()
state := CreateStateForTest(
Key{Kind: Key25519, Votes: 1, Public: pub1.KeyID()},
Key{Kind: Key25519, Votes: 1, Public: pub2.KeyID()},
)
a, _, err := Create(ChonkMem(), state, priv1)
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("tka.Create: %v", err)
return
}
if !a.KeyTrusted(pub1.KeyID()) {
t.Error("pub1 want trusted, got untrusted")
}
if !a.KeyTrusted(pub2.KeyID()) {
t.Error("pub2 want trusted, got untrusted")
}
if a.KeyTrusted(pub3.KeyID()) {
t.Error("pub3 want untrusted, got trusted")
}
}
func TestAuthorityCompact(t *testing.T) {
pub, priv := testingKey25519(t, 1)
key := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 2}
state := CreateStateForTest(key)
c := newTestchain(t, `
G -> A -> B -> C -> D -> E
G.template = genesis
C.template = checkpoint2
`,
genesisTemplate(key),
optTemplate("checkpoint2", AUM{MessageKind: AUMCheckpoint, State: &state}),
optKey("key", key, priv),
optSignAllUsing("key"))
storage := &FS{base: t.TempDir()}
a, err := Bootstrap(storage, c.AUMs["G"])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Bootstrap() failed: %v", err)
}
a.Inform(storage, []AUM{c.AUMs["A"], c.AUMs["B"], c.AUMs["C"], c.AUMs["D"], c.AUMs["E"]})
// Should compact down to C -> D -> E
if err := a.Compact(storage, CompactionOptions{MinChain: 2, MinAge: 1}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if a.oldestAncestor.Hash() != c.AUMHashes["C"] {
t.Errorf("ancestor = %v, want %v", a.oldestAncestor.Hash(), c.AUMHashes["C"])
}
// Make sure the stored authority is still openable and resolves to the same state.
stored, err := Open(storage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Failed to open stored authority: %v", err)
}
if stored.Head() != a.Head() {
t.Errorf("Stored authority head differs: head = %v, want %v", stored.Head(), a.Head())
}
t.Logf("original ancestor = %v", c.AUMHashes["G"])
if anc, _ := storage.LastActiveAncestor(); *anc != c.AUMHashes["C"] {
t.Errorf("ancestor = %v, want %v", anc, c.AUMHashes["C"])
}
}
func TestFindParentForRewrite(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
k1 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 1}
pub2, _ := testingKey25519(t, 2)
k2 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub2, Votes: 1}
k2ID, _ := k2.ID()
pub3, _ := testingKey25519(t, 3)
k3 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub3, Votes: 1}
c := newTestchain(t, `
A -> B -> C -> D -> E
A.template = genesis
B.template = add2
C.template = add3
D.template = remove2
`,
genesisTemplate(k1),
optTemplate("add2", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &k2}),
optTemplate("add3", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &k3}),
optTemplate("remove2", AUM{MessageKind: AUMRemoveKey, KeyID: k2ID}))
a, err := Open(c.Chonk())
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// k1 was trusted at genesis, so there's no better rewrite parent
// than the genesis.
k1ID, _ := k1.ID()
k1P, err := a.findParentForRewrite(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k1ID}, k1ID)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("FindParentForRewrite(k1) failed: %v", err)
}
if k1P != a.oldestAncestor.Hash() {
t.Errorf("FindParentForRewrite(k1) = %v, want %v", k1P, a.oldestAncestor.Hash())
}
// k3 was trusted at C, so B would be an ideal rewrite point.
k3ID, _ := k3.ID()
k3P, err := a.findParentForRewrite(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k3ID}, k1ID)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("FindParentForRewrite(k3) failed: %v", err)
}
if k3P != c.AUMHashes["B"] {
t.Errorf("FindParentForRewrite(k3) = %v, want %v", k3P, c.AUMHashes["B"])
}
// k2 was added but then removed, so HEAD is an appropriate rewrite point.
k2P, err := a.findParentForRewrite(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k2ID}, k1ID)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("FindParentForRewrite(k2) failed: %v", err)
}
if k3P != c.AUMHashes["B"] {
t.Errorf("FindParentForRewrite(k2) = %v, want %v", k2P, a.Head())
}
// There's no appropriate point where both k2 and k3 are simultaneously not trusted,
// so the best rewrite point is the genesis AUM.
doubleP, err := a.findParentForRewrite(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k2ID, k3ID}, k1ID)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("FindParentForRewrite({k2, k3}) failed: %v", err)
}
if doubleP != a.oldestAncestor.Hash() {
t.Errorf("FindParentForRewrite({k2, k3}) = %v, want %v", doubleP, a.oldestAncestor.Hash())
}
}
func TestMakeRetroactiveRevocation(t *testing.T) {
pub, _ := testingKey25519(t, 1)
k1 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub, Votes: 1}
pub2, _ := testingKey25519(t, 2)
k2 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub2, Votes: 1}
pub3, _ := testingKey25519(t, 3)
k3 := Key{Kind: Key25519, Public: pub3, Votes: 1}
c := newTestchain(t, `
A -> B -> C -> D
A.template = genesis
C.template = add2
D.template = add3
`,
genesisTemplate(k1),
optTemplate("add2", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &k2}),
optTemplate("add3", AUM{MessageKind: AUMAddKey, Key: &k3}))
a, err := Open(c.Chonk())
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// k2 was added by C, so a forking revocation should:
// - have B as a parent
// - trust the remaining keys at the time, k1 & k3.
k1ID, _ := k1.ID()
k2ID, _ := k2.ID()
k3ID, _ := k3.ID()
forkingAUM, err := a.MakeRetroactiveRevocation(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k2ID}, k1ID, AUMHash{})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("MakeRetroactiveRevocation(k2) failed: %v", err)
}
if bHash := c.AUMHashes["B"]; !bytes.Equal(forkingAUM.PrevAUMHash, bHash[:]) {
t.Errorf("forking AUM has parent %v, want %v", forkingAUM.PrevAUMHash, bHash[:])
}
if _, err := forkingAUM.State.GetKey(k1ID); err != nil {
t.Error("Forked state did not trust k1")
}
if _, err := forkingAUM.State.GetKey(k3ID); err != nil {
t.Error("Forked state did not trust k3")
}
if _, err := forkingAUM.State.GetKey(k2ID); err == nil {
t.Error("Forked state trusted removed-key k2")
}
// Test that removing all trusted keys results in an error.
_, err = a.MakeRetroactiveRevocation(c.Chonk(), []tkatype.KeyID{k1ID, k2ID, k3ID}, k1ID, AUMHash{})
if wantErr := "cannot revoke all trusted keys"; err == nil || err.Error() != wantErr {
t.Fatalf("MakeRetroactiveRevocation({k1, k2, k3}) returned %v, expected %q", err, wantErr)
}
}