Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Will Norris 3ec5be3f51 all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.

A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---

The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.

The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".

This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.

Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:

> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.

It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.

In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.

Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.

The source file changes were purely mechanical with:

    git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'

Updates #cleanup

Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2026-01-23 15:49:45 -08:00
Will Norris 71029cea2d all: update copyright and license headers
This updates all source files to use a new standard header for copyright
and license declaration.  Notably, copyright no longer includes a date,
and we now use the standard SPDX-License-Identifier header.

This commit was done almost entirely mechanically with perl, and then
some minimal manual fixes.

Updates #6865

Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2023-01-27 15:36:29 -08:00
Josh Soref d4811f11a0 all: fix spelling mistakes
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-09-29 13:36:13 -07:00
Brad Fitzpatrick 116f55ff66 all: gofmt for Go 1.19
Updates #5210

Change-Id: Ib02cd5e43d0a8db60c1f09755a8ac7b140b670be
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
2022-08-02 10:08:05 -07:00
Avery Pennarun 19c3e6cc9e types/logger: rate limited: more hysteresis, better messages.
- Switch to our own simpler token bucket, since x/time/rate is missing
  necessary stuff (can't provide your own time func; can't check the
  current bucket contents) and it's overkill anyway.

- Add tests that actually include advancing time.

- Don't remove the rate limit on a message until there's enough room to
  print at least two more of them. When we do, we'll also print how
  many we dropped, as a contextual reminder that some were previously
  lost. (This is more like how the Linux kernel does it.)

- Reformat the [RATE LIMITED] messages to be shorter, and to not
  corrupt original message. Instead, we print the message, then print
  its format string.

- Use %q instead of \"%s\", for more accurate parsing later, if the
  format string contained quotes.

Fixes #1772

Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
2021-04-30 01:01:15 -04:00