This commit modifies the kubernetes operator to use the `tailscale-client-go-v2`
package instead of the internal tailscale client it was previously using. This
now gives us the ability to expand out custom resources and features as they
become available via the API module.
The tailnet reconciler has also been modified to manage clients as tailnets
are created and removed, providing each subsequent reconciler with a single
`ClientProvider` that obtains a tailscale client for the respective tailnet
by name, or the operator's default when presented with a blank string.
Fixes: https://github.com/tailscale/corp/issues/38418
Signed-off-by: David Bond <davidsbond93@gmail.com>
Add a new vet analyzer that checks t.Run subtest names don't contain
characters requiring quoting when re-running via "go test -run". This
enforces the style guide rule: don't use spaces or punctuation in
subtest names.
The analyzer flags:
- Direct t.Run calls with string literal names containing spaces,
regex metacharacters, quotes, or other problematic characters
- Table-driven t.Run(tt.name, ...) calls where tt ranges over a
slice/map literal with bad name field values
Also fix all 978 existing violations across 81 test files, replacing
spaces with hyphens and shortening long sentence-like names to concise
hyphenated forms.
Updates #19242
Change-Id: Ib0ad96a111bd8e764582d1d4902fe2599454ab65
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This commit implements a reconciler for the new `ProxyGroupPolicy`
custom resource. When created, all `ProxyGroupPolicy` resources
within the same namespace are merged into two `ValidatingAdmissionPolicy`
resources, one for egress and one for ingress.
These policies use CEL expressions to limit the usage of the
"tailscale.com/proxy-group" annotation on `Service` and `Ingress`
resources on create & update.
Included here is also a new e2e test that ensures that resources that
violate the policy return an error on creation, and that once the
policy is changed to allow them they can be created.
Closes: https://github.com/tailscale/corp/issues/36830
Signed-off-by: David Bond <davidsbond93@gmail.com>
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
This commit contains the implementation of multi-tailnet support within the Kubernetes Operator
Each of our custom resources now expose the `spec.tailnet` field. This field is a string that must match the name of an existing `Tailnet` resource. A `Tailnet` resource looks like this:
```yaml
apiVersion: tailscale.com/v1alpha1
kind: Tailnet
metadata:
name: example # This is the name that must be referenced by other resources
spec:
credentials:
secretName: example-oauth
```
Each `Tailnet` references a `Secret` resource that contains a set of oauth credentials. This secret must be created in the same namespace as the operator:
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: example-oauth # This is the name that's referenced by the Tailnet resource.
namespace: tailscale
stringData:
client_id: "client-id"
client_secret: "client-secret"
```
When created, the operator performs a basic check that the oauth client has access to all required scopes. This is done using read actions on devices, keys & services. While this doesn't capture a missing "write" permission, it catches completely missing permissions. Once this check passes, the `Tailnet` moves into a ready state and can be referenced. Attempting to use a `Tailnet` in a non-ready state will stall the deployment of `Connector`s, `ProxyGroup`s and `Recorder`s until the `Tailnet` becomes ready.
The `spec.tailnet` field informs the operator that a `Connector`, `ProxyGroup`, or `Recorder` must be given an auth key generated using the specified oauth client. For backwards compatibility, the set of credentials the operator is configured with are considered the default. That is, where `spec.tailnet` is not set, the resource will be deployed in the same tailnet as the operator.
Updates https://github.com/tailscale/corp/issues/34561
David Bond
Brad Fitzpatrick
Will Norris