Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
BeckyPauleyandGitHub 6ee7bcb458 cmd/{k8s-operator,containerboot,kube}: support IPv6 in egress ProxyGroup (#19898)
* cmd/{k8s-operator,containerboot,k8s-proxy},kube: support IPv6 in egress ProxyGroup

  Add support for dual-stack and IPv6 clusters in egress ProxyGroup.
  Previously, egress ProxyGroup only supported IPv4: the operator and
  containerboot assumed IPv4 for ClusterIP Services, EndpointSlices,
  and health check headers.

  This change introduces the following:

  - Create a per-family EndpointSlice instead of a single IPv4
    EndpointSlice.

  - Update the egress services readiness reconciler to account for
    both IPv4 and IPv6 EndpointSlices.

  - Update the pod readiness reconciler to use the primary Pod IP
    (PodIPs[0]) for readiness checks, instead of hard-coding to use
    IPv4.

  - Update the /healthz handler to return both PodIPv4Header and
    PodIPv6Header.

  - Add an IPv6 address field to egress status.

  - Update containerboot and k8s-proxy to use the new health check
    logic.

Updates tailscale/corp#41677

Change-Id: If66a3146df48c75b1e65a71632bbc9fc75feded2
Signed-off-by: Becky Pauley <becky@tailscale.com>

* cmd/{k8s-operator,containerboot}: improve dual-stack egress ProxyGroup

On dual-stack clusters, an egress ProxyGroup Service has one EndpointSlice
per IP family (IPv4 and IPv6). However, EndpointSlices were only recreated
when the ExternalName Service configuration changed, so a deleted
EndpointSlice was not recreated. The egress readiness reconciler also had
no mechanism to identify which IP families should exist (previously only
an IPv4 EndpoitSlice was required).

We now create an EndpointSlice for every IP family the ClusterIP Service
supports.

Also mark an egress Service NotReady when an EndpointSlice for an expected IP
family (derived from the Service's ClusterIPs) is missing, so a
dual-stack Service missing a family's EndpointSlice is no longer reported
Ready.

Clarify that the egress pre-shutdown and Pod readiness health checks
verify only one IP family on dual-stack clusters.

Change-Id: I35b03daf76ac817cd516e9a731770b2d85f6ee16
Signed-off-by: Becky Pauley <becky@tailscale.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Becky Pauley <becky@tailscale.com>
2026-07-14 13:26:40 +01:00
David BondandGitHub 644c3224e9 cmd/{containerboot,k8s-operator}: don't return pointers to maps (#19593)
This commit modifies the usage of the `egressservices.Configs` type
within containerboot and the k8s operator.

Originally it was being thrown around as a pointer which is not required
as maps are already pointers under the hood.

Signed-off-by: David Bond <davidsbond93@gmail.com>
2026-04-30 16:11:00 +01:00
Will NorrisandWill Norris 3ec5be3f51 all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.

A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---

The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.

The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".

This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.

Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:

> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.

It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.

In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.

Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.

The source file changes were purely mechanical with:

    git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'

Updates #cleanup

Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2026-01-23 15:49:45 -08:00
Irbe KruminaandGitHub 6b97e615d6 cmd/containerboot,kube/ingressservices: proxy VIPService TCP/UDP traffic to cluster Services (#15897)
cmd/containerboot,kube/ingressservices: proxy VIPService TCP/UDP traffic to cluster Services

This PR is part of the work to implement HA for Kubernetes Operator's
network layer proxy.
Adds logic to containerboot to monitor mounted ingress firewall configuration rules
and update iptables/nftables rules as the config changes.
Also adds new shared types for the ingress configuration.
The implementation is intentionally similar to that for HA for egress proxy.

Updates tailscale/tailscale#15895

Signed-off-by: chaosinthecrd <tom@tmlabs.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
2025-05-19 10:42:03 +01:00