I omitted a lot of the min/max modernizers because they didn't
result in more clear code.
Some of it's older "for x := range 123".
Also: errors.AsType, any, fmt.Appendf, etc.
Updates #18682
Change-Id: I83a451577f33877f962766a5b65ce86f7696471c
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
TestOnlyTaggedPeersCanBeDialed has a race condition:
- The test untags ps[2] and waits until ps[0] sees this tag dropped from
ps[2] in the netmap.
- Later the test tries to dial ps[2] from ps[0] and expects the dial to
fail as authorization to dial relies on the presence of the tag, now
removed from ps[2].
- However, the authorization layer caches the status used to consult peer
tags. When the dial happens before the cache times out, the test fails.
- Due to a bug in testcontrol.Server.UpdateNode, which the test uses to
remove the tag, netmap updates are not immediately triggered. The test
has to wait for the next natural set of netmap updates, which on my
machine takes about 22 seconds. As a result, the cache in the
authorization layer times out and the test passes.
- If one fixes the bug in UpdateNode, then netmap updates happen
immediately, the cache is no longer timed out when the dial occurs, and
the test fails.
Fixes#18720
Updates #18703
Signed-off-by: Harry Harpham <harry@tailscale.com>
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
It's an unnecessary nuisance having it. We go out of our way to redact
it in so many places when we don't even need it there anyway.
Updates #12639
Change-Id: I5fc72e19e9cf36caeb42cf80ba430873f67167c3
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Add the ability for operators of natc in consensus mode to remove
servers from the raft cluster config, without losing other state.
Updates #14667
Signed-off-by: Fran Bull <fran@tailscale.com>
Currently consensus has a bootstrap routine where a tsnet node tries to
join each other node with the cluster tag, and if it is not able to join
any other node it starts its own cluster.
That algorithm is racy, and can result in split brain (more than one
leader/cluster) if all the nodes for a cluster are started at the same
time.
Add a FollowOnly argument to the bootstrap function. If provided this
tsnet node will never lead, it will try (and retry with exponential back
off) to follow any node it can contact.
Add a --follow-only flag to cmd/natc that uses this new tsconsensus
functionality.
Also slightly reorganize some arguments into opts structs.
Updates #14667
Signed-off-by: Fran Bull <fran@tailscale.com>
We have been unintentionally ignoring errors from calling bootstrap.
bootstrap sometimes calls raft.BootstrapCluster which sometimes returns
a safe to ignore error, handle that case appropriately.
Updates #14667
Signed-off-by: Fran Bull <fran@tailscale.com>
tsconsensus enables tsnet.Server instances to form a consensus.
tsconsensus wraps hashicorp/raft with
* the ability to do discovery via tailscale tags
* inter node communication over tailscale
* routing of commands to the leader
Updates #14667
Signed-off-by: Fran Bull <fran@tailscale.com>
Brad Fitzpatrick
Harry Harpham
Will Norris
Fran Bull
Alex Chan