* util/linuxfw: fix delete snat rule
This pr is fixing the bug that in nftables mode setting snat-subnet-routes=false doesn't
delete the masq rule in nat table.
Updates #15661
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liang <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
* change index arithmetic in test to chunk
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liang <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
* reuse rule creation function in rule delete
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liang <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
* add test for deleting the masq rule
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liang <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kevin Liang <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
The AddSNATRuleForDst rule was adding a new rule each time it was called including:
- if a rule already existed
- if a rule matching the destination, but with different desired source already existed
This was causing issues especially for the in-progress egress HA proxies work,
where the rules are now refreshed more frequently, so more redundant rules
were being created.
This change:
- only creates the rule if it doesn't already exist
- if a rule for the same dst, but different source is found, delete it
- also ensures that egress proxies refresh firewall rules
if the node's tailnet IP changes
Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
* util/linuxfw: fix IPv6 NAT availability check for nftables
When running firewall in nftables mode,
there is no need for a separate NAT availability check
(unlike with iptables, there are no hosts that support nftables, but not IPv6 NAT - see tailscale/tailscale#11353).
This change fixes a firewall NAT availability check that was using the no-longer set ipv6NATAvailable field
by removing the field and using a method that, for nftables, just checks that IPv6 is available.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#12008
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
We were previously using the netlink API to see if there are chains/rules that
already exist. This works fine in environments where there is either full
nftable support or no support at all. However, we have identified certain
environments which have partial nftable support and the only feasible way of
detecting such an environment is to try to create some of the chains that we
need.
This adds a check to create a dummy postrouting chain which is immediately
deleted. The goal of the check is to ensure we are able to use nftables and
that it won't error out later. This check is only done in the path where we
detected that the system has no preexisting nftable rules.
Updates #5621
Updates #8555
Updates #8762
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
These tests were broken at HEAD. CI currently does not run these
as root, will figure out how to do that in a followup.
Updates #5621
Updates #8555
Updates #8762
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
Just a refactor to consolidate the firewall detection logic in a single
package so that it can be reused in a later commit by containerboot.
Updates #9310
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
Add an explicit accept rule for input to the tun interface, as a mirror
to the explicit rule to accept output from the tun interface.
The rule matches any packet in to our tun interface and accepts it, and
the rule is positioned and prioritized such that it should be evaluated
prior to conventional ufw/iptables/nft rules.
Updates #391Fixes#7332
Updates #9084
Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
This commit tries to mimic the way iptables-nft work with the filewall rules. We
follow the convention of using tables like filter, nat and the conventional
chains, to make our nftables implementation work with ufw.
Updates: #391
Signed-off-by: KevinLiang10 <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
This commit adds nftable rule injection for tailscaled. If tailscaled is
started with envknob TS_DEBUG_USE_NETLINK_NFTABLES = true, the router
will use nftables to manage firewall rules.
Updates: #391
Signed-off-by: KevinLiang10 <kevinliang@tailscale.com>
KevinLiang10
Irbe Krumina
Maisem Ali
James Tucker
KevinLiang10