I omitted a lot of the min/max modernizers because they didn't
result in more clear code.
Some of it's older "for x := range 123".
Also: errors.AsType, any, fmt.Appendf, etc.
Updates #18682
Change-Id: I83a451577f33877f962766a5b65ce86f7696471c
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
When a Linux system acts as an exit node or subnet router with strict
reverse path filtering (rp_filter=1), reply packets may
be dropped because they fail the RPF check. Reply packets arrive on the
WAN interface but the routing table indicates they should have arrived
on the Tailscale interface, causing the kernel to drop them.
This adds firewall rules in the mangle table to save outbound packet
marks to conntrack and restore them on reply packets before the routing
decision. When reply packets have their marks restored, the kernel uses
the correct routing table (based on the mark) and the packets pass the
rp_filter check.
Implementation adds two rules per address family (IPv4/IPv6):
- mangle/OUTPUT: Save packet marks to conntrack for NEW connections
with non-zero marks in the Tailscale fwmark range (0xff0000)
- mangle/PREROUTING: Restore marks from conntrack to packets for
ESTABLISHED,RELATED connections before routing decision and rp_filter
check
The workaround is automatically enabled when UseConnmarkForRPFilter is
set in the router configuration, which happens when subnet routes are
advertised on Linux systems.
Both iptables and nftables implementations are provided, with automatic
backend detection.
Fixes#3310Fixes#14409Fixes#12022Fixes#15815Fixes#9612
Signed-off-by: Mike O'Driscoll <mikeo@tailscale.com>
When an exit node has been set and a new default route is added,
create a new rtable in the default rdomain and add the current
default route via its physical interface. When control() is
requesting a connection not go through the exit-node default route,
we can use the SO_RTABLE socket option to force it through the new
rtable we created.
Updates #17321
Signed-off-by: joshua stein <jcs@jcs.org>
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
Also pull out interface method only needed in Linux.
Instead of having userspace do the call into the router, just let the
router pick up the change itself.
Updates #15160
Signed-off-by: Claus Lensbøl <claus@tailscale.com>
As found by @cmol in #17423.
Updates #17423
Change-Id: I1492501f74ca7b57a8c5278ea6cb87a56a4086b9
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
So wgengine/router is just the docs + entrypoint + types, and then
underscore importing wgengine/router/osrouter registers the constructors
with the wgengine/router package.
Then tsnet can not pull those in.
Updates #17313
Change-Id: If313226f6987d709ea9193c8f16a909326ceefe7
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Brad Fitzpatrick
Mike O'Driscoll
joshua stein
Will Norris
Alex Chan
Sachin Iyer
M. J. Fromberger
Claus Lensbøl