This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
Step 3 in the series. See earlier cc532efc20 and d05e6dc09e.
This step moves some types into a new leaf "ptype" package out of the
big "settings" package. The policyclient.Client will later get new
methods to return those things (as well as Duration and Uint64, which
weren't done at the time of the earlier prototype).
Updates #16998
Updates #12614
Change-Id: I4d72d8079de3b5351ed602eaa72863372bd474a2
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This is step 1 of ~3, breaking up #14720 into reviewable chunks, with
the aim to make syspolicy be a build-time configurable feature.
In this first (very noisy) step, all the syspolicy string key
constants move to a new constant-only (code-free) package. This will
make future steps more reviewable, without this movement noise.
There are no code or behavior changes here.
The future steps of this series can be seen in #14720: removing global
funcs from syspolicy resolution and using an interface that's plumbed
around instead. Then adding build tags.
Updates #12614
Change-Id: If73bf2c28b9c9b1a408fe868b0b6a25b03eeabd1
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
I added yet another one in 6d117d64a2 but that new one is at the
best place int he dependency graph and has the best name, so let's use
that one for everything possible.
types/lazy can't use it for circular dependency reasons, so unexport
that copy at least.
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: I25db6b6a0d81dbb8e89a0a9080c7f15cbf7aa770
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
In this PR we add syspolicy/rsop package that facilitates policy source registration
and provides access to the resultant policy merged from all registered sources for a
given scope.
Updates #12687
Signed-off-by: Nick Khyl <nickk@tailscale.com>
Package setting contains types for defining and representing policy settings.
It facilitates the registration of setting definitions using Register and RegisterDefinition,
and the retrieval of registered setting definitions via Definitions and DefinitionOf.
This package is intended for use primarily within the syspolicy package hierarchy,
and added in a preparation for the next PRs.
Updates #12687
Signed-off-by: Nick Khyl <nickk@tailscale.com>
Will Norris
Alex Chan
Brad Fitzpatrick
Nick Khyl