Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
33da8a8d68
main
webnet
${ noResults }
2 Commits (33da8a8d6829dfb8e888feaa3cbbd97cbba741bd)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3ec5be3f51 |
all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in the history of Tailscale's open source releases. A Brief History of AUTHORS files --- The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact. The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The Chromium Authors". This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way for the proejct maintainer to know. Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors. They are also clear that: > Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the > project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership. It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright holders. In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so it's ambiguous what that means. Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which provides some additional certification of their right to make the contribution. The source file changes were purely mechanical with: git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g' Updates #cleanup Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com> |
3 months ago |
|
|
6428ba01ef
|
logtail/filch: rewrite the package (#18143)
The filch implementation is fairly broken: * When Filch.cur exceeds MaxFileSize, it calls moveContents to copy the entirety of cur into alt (while holding the write lock). By nature, this is the movement of a lot of data in a hot path, meaning that all log calls will be globally blocked! It also means that log uploads will be blocked during the move. * The implementation of moveContents is buggy in that it copies data from cur into the start of alt, but fails to truncate alt to the number of bytes copied. Consequently, there are unrelated lines near the end, leading to out-of-order lines when being read back. * Data filched via stderr do not directly respect MaxFileSize, which is only checked every 100 Filch.Write calls. This means that it is possible that the file grows far beyond the specified max file size before moveContents is called. * If both log files have data when New is called, it also copies the entirety of cur into alt. This can block the startup of a process copying lots of data before the process can do any useful work. * TryReadLine is implemented using bufio.Scanner. Unfortunately, it will choke on any lines longer than bufio.MaxScanTokenSize, rather than gracefully skip over them. The re-implementation avoids a lot of these problems by fundamentally eliminating the need for moveContent. We enforce MaxFileSize by simply rotating the log files whenever the current file exceeds MaxFileSize/2. This is a constant-time operation regardless of file size. To more gracefully handle lines longer than bufio.MaxScanTokenSize, we skip over these lines (without growing the read buffer) and report an error. This allows subsequent lines to be read. In order to improve debugging, we add a lot of metrics. Note that the the mechanism of dup2 with stderr is inherently racy with a the two file approach. The order of operations during a rotation is carefully chosen to reduce the race window to be as short as possible. Thus, this is slightly less racy than before. Updates tailscale/corp#21363 Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net> |
5 months ago |