Tag:
Branch:
Tree:
33da8a8d68
main
webnet
${ noResults }
4 Commits (33da8a8d6829dfb8e888feaa3cbbd97cbba741bd)
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3ec5be3f51 |
all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in the history of Tailscale's open source releases. A Brief History of AUTHORS files --- The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact. The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The Chromium Authors". This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way for the proejct maintainer to know. Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors. They are also clear that: > Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the > project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership. It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright holders. In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so it's ambiguous what that means. Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which provides some additional certification of their right to make the contribution. The source file changes were purely mechanical with: git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g' Updates #cleanup Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com> |
3 months ago |
|
|
80b2b45d60 |
ipn/ipnlocal: refactor and cleanup profileManager
In preparation for multi-user and unattended mode improvements, we are refactoring and cleaning up `ipn/ipnlocal.profileManager`. The concept of the "current user", which is only relevant on Windows, is being deprecated and will soon be removed to allow more than one Windows user to connect and utilize `LocalBackend` according to that user's access rights to the device and specific Tailscale profiles. We plan to pass the user's identity down to the `profileManager`, where it can be used to determine the user's access rights to a given `LoginProfile`. While the new permission model in `ipnauth` requires more work and is currently blocked pending PR reviews, we are updating the `profileManager` to reduce its reliance on the concept of a single OS user being connected to the backend at the same time. We extract the switching to the default Tailscale profile, which may also trigger legacy profile migration, from `profileManager.SetCurrentUserID`. This introduces `profileManager.DefaultUserProfileID`, which returns the default profile ID for the current user, and `profileManager.SwitchToDefaultProfile`, which is essentially a shorthand for `pm.SwitchProfile(pm.DefaultUserProfileID())`. Both methods will eventually be updated to accept the user's identity and utilize that user's default profile. We make access checks more explicit by introducing the `profileManager.checkProfileAccess` method. The current implementation continues to use `profileManager.currentUserID` and `LoginProfile.LocalUserID` to determine whether access to a given profile should be granted. This will be updated to utilize the `ipnauth` package and the new permissions model once it's ready. We also expand access checks to be used more widely in the `profileManager`, not just when switching or listing profiles. This includes access checks in methods like `SetPrefs` and, most notably, `DeleteProfile` and `DeleteAllProfiles`, preventing unprivileged Windows users from deleting Tailscale profiles owned by other users on the same device, including profiles owned by local admins. We extract `profileManager.ProfilePrefs` and `profileManager.SetProfilePrefs` methods that can be used to get and set preferences of a given `LoginProfile` if `profileManager.checkProfileAccess` permits access to it. We also update `profileManager.setUnattendedModeAsConfigured` to always enable unattended mode on Windows if `Prefs.ForceDaemon` is true in the current `LoginProfile`, even if `profileManager.currentUserID` is `""`. This facilitates enabling unattended mode via `tailscale up --unattended` even if `tailscale-ipn.exe` is not running, such as when a Group Policy or MDM-deployed script runs at boot time, or when Tailscale is used on a Server Code or otherwise headless Windows environments. See #12239, #2137, #3186 and https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/pull/6255#issuecomment-2016623838 for details. Fixes #12239 Updates tailscale/corp#18342 Updates #3186 Updates #2137 Signed-off-by: Nick Khyl <nickk@tailscale.com> |
2 years ago |
|
|
3e255d76e1 |
ipn/ipnlocal: fix profile duplication
We would only look for duplicate profiles when a new login occurred but when using `--force-reauth` we could switch users which would end up with duplicate profiles. Updates #7726 Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com> |
3 years ago |
|
|
90fd04cbde |
ipn/ipnlocal, util/winutil/policy: modify Windows profile migration to load legacy prefs from within tailscaled
I realized that a lot of the problems that we're seeing around migration and LocalBackend state can be avoided if we drive Windows pref migration entirely from within tailscaled. By doing it this way, tailscaled can automatically perform the migration as soon as the connection with the client frontend is established. Since tailscaled is already running as LocalSystem, it already has access to the user's local AppData directory. The profile manager already knows which user is connected, so we simply need to resolve the user's prefs file and read it from there. Of course, to properly migrate this information we need to also check system policies. I moved a bunch of policy resolution code out of the GUI and into a new package in util/winutil/policy. Updates #7626 Signed-off-by: Aaron Klotz <aaron@tailscale.com> |
3 years ago |