This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
I'd started to do this in the earlier ts_omit_server PR but
decided to split it into this separate PR.
Updates #17128
Change-Id: Ief8823a78d1f7bbb79e64a5cab30a7d0a5d6ff4b
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
So the control plane can delete TXT records more aggressively
after client's done with ACME fetch.
Updates tailscale/corp#15848
Change-Id: I4f1140305bee11ee3eee93d4fec3aef2bd6c5a7e
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We were eagerly doing a synchronous renewal of the cert while
trying to serve traffic. Instead of that, just do the cert
renewal in the background and continue serving traffic as long
as the cert is still valid.
This regressed in c1ecae13ab when
we introduced ARI support and were trying to make the experience
of `tailscale cert` better. However, that ended up regressing
the experience for tsnet as it would not always doing the renewal
synchronously.
Fixes#9783
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
While our `shouldStartDomainRenewal` check is correct, `getCertPEM`
would always bail if the existing cert is not expired. Add the same
`shouldStartDomainRenewal` check to `getCertPEM` to make it proceed with
renewal when existing certs are still valid but should be renewed.
The extra check is expensive (ARI request towards LetsEncrypt), so cache
the last check result for 1hr to not degrade `tailscale serve`
performance.
Also, asynchronous renewal is great for `tailscale serve` but confusing
for `tailscale cert`. Add an explicit flag to `GetCertPEM` to force a
synchronous renewal for `tailscale cert`.
Fixes#8725
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lytvynov <awly@tailscale.com>
This updates all source files to use a new standard header for copyright
and license declaration. Notably, copyright no longer includes a date,
and we now use the standard SPDX-License-Identifier header.
This commit was done almost entirely mechanically with perl, and then
some minimal manual fixes.
Updates #6865
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
Will Norris
Brad Fitzpatrick
Maisem Ali
Andrew Lytvynov