2 Commits (33da8a8d6829dfb8e888feaa3cbbd97cbba741bd)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Will Norris	3ec5be3f51	all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it ... This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in the history of Tailscale's open source releases. A Brief History of AUTHORS files --- The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact. The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The Chromium Authors". This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way for the proejct maintainer to know. Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors. They are also clear that: > Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the > project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership. It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright holders. In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so it's ambiguous what that means. Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which provides some additional certification of their right to make the contribution. The source file changes were purely mechanical with: git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g' Updates #cleanup Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>	3 months ago
Irbe Krumina	6b97e615d6	cmd/containerboot,kube/ingressservices: proxy VIPService TCP/UDP traffic to cluster Services (#15897) ... cmd/containerboot,kube/ingressservices: proxy VIPService TCP/UDP traffic to cluster Services This PR is part of the work to implement HA for Kubernetes Operator's network layer proxy. Adds logic to containerboot to monitor mounted ingress firewall configuration rules and update iptables/nftables rules as the config changes. Also adds new shared types for the ingress configuration. The implementation is intentionally similar to that for HA for egress proxy. Updates tailscale/tailscale#15895 Signed-off-by: chaosinthecrd <tom@tmlabs.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>	11 months ago
Irbe Krumina	b406f209c3	cmd/{k8s-operator,containerboot},kube: ensure egress ProxyGroup proxies don't terminate while cluster traffic is still routed to them (#14436) ... cmd/{containerboot,k8s-operator},kube: add preshutdown hook for egress PG proxies This change is part of work towards minimizing downtime during update rollouts of egress ProxyGroup replicas. This change: - updates the containerboot health check logic to return Pod IP in headers, if set - always runs the health check for egress PG proxies - updates ClusterIP Services created for PG egress endpoints to include the health check endpoint - implements preshutdown endpoint in proxies. The preshutdown endpoint logic waits till, for all currently configured egress services, the ClusterIP Service health check endpoint is no longer returned by the shutting-down Pod (by looking at the new Pod IP header). - ensures that kubelet is configured to call the preshutdown endpoint This reduces the possibility that, as replicas are terminated during an update, a replica gets terminated to which cluster traffic is still being routed via the ClusterIP Service because kube proxy has not yet updated routig rules. This is not a perfect check as in practice, it only checks that the kube proxy on the node on which the proxy runs has updated rules. However, overall this might be good enough. The preshutdown logic is disabled if users have configured a custom health check port via TS_LOCAL_ADDR_PORT env var. This change throws a warnign if so and in future setting of that env var for operator proxies might be disallowed (as users shouldn't need to configure this for a Pod directly). This is backwards compatible with earlier proxy versions. Updates tailscale/tailscale#14326 Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>	1 year ago
Irbe Krumina	096b090caf	cmd/containerboot,kube,util/linuxfw: configure kube egress proxies to route to 1+ tailnet targets (#13531) ... * cmd/containerboot,kube,util/linuxfw: configure kube egress proxies to route to 1+ tailnet targets This commit is first part of the work to allow running multiple replicas of the Kubernetes operator egress proxies per tailnet service + to allow exposing multiple tailnet services via each proxy replica. This expands the existing iptables/nftables-based proxy configuration mechanism. A proxy can now be configured to route to one or more tailnet targets via a (mounted) config file that, for each tailnet target, specifies: - the target's tailnet IP or FQDN - mappings of container ports to which cluster workloads will send traffic to tailnet target ports where the traffic should be forwarded. Example configfile contents: { "some-svc": {"tailnetTarget":{"fqdn":"foo.tailnetxyz.ts.net","ports"{"tcp:4006:80":{"protocol":"tcp","matchPort":4006,"targetPort":80},"tcp:4007:443":{"protocol":"tcp","matchPort":4007,"targetPort":443}}}} } A proxy that is configured with this config file will configure firewall rules to route cluster traffic to the tailnet targets. It will then watch the config file for updates as well as monitor relevant netmap updates and reconfigure firewall as needed. This adds a bunch of new iptables/nftables functionality to make it easier to dynamically update the firewall rules without needing to restart the proxy Pod as well as to make it easier to debug/understand the rules: - for iptables, each portmapping is a DNAT rule with a comment pointing at the 'service',i.e: -A PREROUTING ! -i tailscale0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 4006 -m comment --comment "some-svc:tcp:4006 -> tcp:80" -j DNAT --to-destination 100.64.1.18:80 Additionally there is a SNAT rule for each tailnet target, to mask the source address. - for nftables, a separate prerouting chain is created for each tailnet target and all the portmapping rules are placed in that chain. This makes it easier to look up rules and delete services when no longer needed. (nftables allows hooking a custom chain to a prerouting hook, so no extra work is needed to ensure that the rules in the service chains are evaluated). The next steps will be to get the Kubernetes Operator to generate the configfile and ensure it is mounted to the relevant proxy nodes. Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406 Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>	2 years ago