This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.
A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---
The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.
The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".
This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.
Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:
> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.
It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.
In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.
Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.
The source file changes were purely mechanical with:
git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
Adds support for targeting FQDNs that are a Tailscale Service. Uses the
same method of searching for Services as the tailscale configure
kubeconfig command. This fixes using the tailscale.com/tailnet-fqdn
annotation for Kubernetes Service when the specified FQDN is a Tailscale
Service.
Fixes#16534
Change-Id: I422795de76dc83ae30e7e757bc4fbd8eec21cc64
Signed-off-by: Tom Proctor <tomhjp@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Becky Pauley <becky@tailscale.com>
And another case of the same typo in a comment elsewhere.
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: Iaa9d865a1cf83318d4a30263c691451b5d708c9c
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Our own WaitGroup wrapper type was a prototype implementation
for the Go method on the standard sync.WaitGroup type.
Now that there is first-class support for Go,
we should migrate over to using it and delete syncs.WaitGroup.
Updates #cleanup
Updates tailscale/tailscale#16330
Change-Id: Ib52b10f9847341ce29b4ca0da927dc9321691235
Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
cmd/containerboot,kube/ingressservices: proxy VIPService TCP/UDP traffic to cluster Services
This PR is part of the work to implement HA for Kubernetes Operator's
network layer proxy.
Adds logic to containerboot to monitor mounted ingress firewall configuration rules
and update iptables/nftables rules as the config changes.
Also adds new shared types for the ingress configuration.
The implementation is intentionally similar to that for HA for egress proxy.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#15895
Signed-off-by: chaosinthecrd <tom@tmlabs.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
The test suite had grown to about 20s on my machine, but it doesn't
do much taxing work so was a good candidate to parallelise. Now runs
in under 2s on my machine.
Updates #cleanup
Change-Id: I2fcc6be9ca226c74c0cb6c906778846e959492e4
Signed-off-by: Tom Proctor <tomhjp@users.noreply.github.com>
It was moved in f57fa3cbc3.
Updates tailscale/corp#22748
Change-Id: I19f965e6bded1d4c919310aa5b864f2de0cd6220
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
cmd/{containerboot,k8s-operator},kube: add preshutdown hook for egress PG proxies
This change is part of work towards minimizing downtime during update
rollouts of egress ProxyGroup replicas.
This change:
- updates the containerboot health check logic to return Pod IP in headers,
if set
- always runs the health check for egress PG proxies
- updates ClusterIP Services created for PG egress endpoints to include
the health check endpoint
- implements preshutdown endpoint in proxies. The preshutdown endpoint
logic waits till, for all currently configured egress services, the ClusterIP
Service health check endpoint is no longer returned by the shutting-down Pod
(by looking at the new Pod IP header).
- ensures that kubelet is configured to call the preshutdown endpoint
This reduces the possibility that, as replicas are terminated during an update,
a replica gets terminated to which cluster traffic is still being routed via
the ClusterIP Service because kube proxy has not yet updated routig rules.
This is not a perfect check as in practice, it only checks that the kube
proxy on the node on which the proxy runs has updated rules. However, overall
this might be good enough.
The preshutdown logic is disabled if users have configured a custom health check
port via TS_LOCAL_ADDR_PORT env var. This change throws a warnign if so and in
future setting of that env var for operator proxies might be disallowed (as users
shouldn't need to configure this for a Pod directly).
This is backwards compatible with earlier proxy versions.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#14326
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
Adds functionality to kube client to emit Events.
Updates kube store to emit Events when tailscaled state has been loaded, updated or if any errors where
encountered during those operations.
This should help in cases where an error related to state loading/updating caused the Pod to crash in a loop-
unlike logs of the originally failed container instance, Events associated with the Pod will still be
accessible even after N restarts.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#14080
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
Currently egress Services for ProxyGroup only work for Pods and Services
with IPv4 addresses. Ensure that it works on dual stack clusters by reading
proxy Pod's IP from the .status.podIPs list that always contains both
IPv4 and IPv6 address (if the Pod has them) rather than .status.podIP that
could contain IPv6 only for a dual stack cluster.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
Adds a new reconciler that reconciles ExternalName Services that define a
tailnet target that should be exposed to cluster workloads on a ProxyGroup's
proxies.
The reconciler ensures that for each such service, the config mounted to
the proxies is updated with the tailnet target definition and that
and EndpointSlice and ClusterIP Service are created for the service.
Adds a new reconciler that ensures that as proxy Pods become ready to route
traffic to a tailnet target, the EndpointSlice for the target is updated
with the Pods' endpoints.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
The AddSNATRuleForDst rule was adding a new rule each time it was called including:
- if a rule already existed
- if a rule matching the destination, but with different desired source already existed
This was causing issues especially for the in-progress egress HA proxies work,
where the rules are now refreshed more frequently, so more redundant rules
were being created.
This change:
- only creates the rule if it doesn't already exist
- if a rule for the same dst, but different source is found, delete it
- also ensures that egress proxies refresh firewall rules
if the node's tailnet IP changes
Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
* cmd/containerboot,kube,util/linuxfw: configure kube egress proxies to route to 1+ tailnet targets
This commit is first part of the work to allow running multiple
replicas of the Kubernetes operator egress proxies per tailnet service +
to allow exposing multiple tailnet services via each proxy replica.
This expands the existing iptables/nftables-based proxy configuration
mechanism.
A proxy can now be configured to route to one or more tailnet targets
via a (mounted) config file that, for each tailnet target, specifies:
- the target's tailnet IP or FQDN
- mappings of container ports to which cluster workloads will send traffic to
tailnet target ports where the traffic should be forwarded.
Example configfile contents:
{
"some-svc": {"tailnetTarget":{"fqdn":"foo.tailnetxyz.ts.net","ports"{"tcp:4006:80":{"protocol":"tcp","matchPort":4006,"targetPort":80},"tcp:4007:443":{"protocol":"tcp","matchPort":4007,"targetPort":443}}}}
}
A proxy that is configured with this config file will configure firewall rules
to route cluster traffic to the tailnet targets. It will then watch the config file
for updates as well as monitor relevant netmap updates and reconfigure firewall
as needed.
This adds a bunch of new iptables/nftables functionality to make it easier to dynamically update
the firewall rules without needing to restart the proxy Pod as well as to make
it easier to debug/understand the rules:
- for iptables, each portmapping is a DNAT rule with a comment pointing
at the 'service',i.e:
-A PREROUTING ! -i tailscale0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 4006 -m comment --comment "some-svc:tcp:4006 -> tcp:80" -j DNAT --to-destination 100.64.1.18:80
Additionally there is a SNAT rule for each tailnet target, to mask the source address.
- for nftables, a separate prerouting chain is created for each tailnet target
and all the portmapping rules are placed in that chain. This makes it easier
to look up rules and delete services when no longer needed.
(nftables allows hooking a custom chain to a prerouting hook, so no extra work
is needed to ensure that the rules in the service chains are evaluated).
The next steps will be to get the Kubernetes Operator to generate
the configfile and ensure it is mounted to the relevant proxy nodes.
Updates tailscale/tailscale#13406
Signed-off-by: Irbe Krumina <irbe@tailscale.com>
BeckyPauley
Will Norris
Tom Proctor
Brad Fitzpatrick
Joe Tsai
Irbe Krumina